ASHBY BRIDGE CLUB              

DUPLICATE RESULTS
Home

Duplicate results

 Monday  08/03/2010 
5 Table 27 Board Howell Movement
Director: Pat

OVERALL RANKS
Rank Pair Names Cat Total Max Score
1 3 John Wilcox & Malcolm Dawson   154.00 216 71.30%
2 1 Geoff Haywood & Don James   141.00 216 65.28%
3 2 Mike Coke & David Parsons   129.00 216 59.72%
4 4 Betty Vos & Maggie Bennett   114.00 216 52.78%
5 9 James Crotty & Shirley White   113.00 216 52.31%
6 7 Janet Kirkland & Nora Hunter   95.00 216 43.98%
7 8 Bill Ball & Margery Hopkinson   93.00 216 43.06%
8 10 Helen Dunham & Pat Dunham   90.00 216 41.67%
9 5 Frank Aldridge & Margaret Finch   81.00 216 37.50%
10 6 Sheila Rumbelow & Colin Stinchcombe   70.00 216 32.41%
 Top = 8

BOARD 1    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 2H= N KC 110   8 0 Coke & Parsons Vos & Bennett
3 9 2Sx-3 S C   -500 0 8 Wilcox & Dawson Crotty & White
5 1 2C+1 E     -110 5 3 Aldridge & Finch Haywood & James
7 6 3C= E H   -110 5 3 Kirkland & Hunter Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
10 8 2NT= W H   -120 2 6 Dunham & Dunham Ball & Hopkinson

BOARD 2    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 3H+1 S KD 170   5 3 Coke & Parsons Vos & Bennett
3 9 4H= S AD 620   8 0 Wilcox & Dawson Crotty & White
5 1 3D-1 E   50   0 8 Aldridge & Finch Haywood & James
7 6 3H+1 S   170   5 3 Kirkland & Hunter Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
10 8 3H= S AD 140   2 6 Dunham & Dunham Ball & Hopkinson

BOARD 3    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 4H-2 W* D 200   7 1 Coke & Parsons Vos & Bennett
3 9 1H= W* KS   -80 4 4 Wilcox & Dawson Crotty & White
5 1 2NT+2 W C   -180 0 8 Aldridge & Finch Haywood & James
7 6 2H-3 N*     -150 2 6 Kirkland & Hunter Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
10 8 3NT-2 E   200   7 1 Dunham & Dunham Ball & Hopkinson

BOARD 4    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 5 2H+1 E C   -140 7 1 Wilcox & Dawson Aldridge & Finch
4 1 1H+4 E D   -200 4 4 Vos & Bennett Haywood & James
6 2 4H+1 E S   -650 1 7 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Coke & Parsons
8 7 2H+1 E QS   -140 7 1 Ball & Hopkinson Kirkland & Hunter
10 9 4H+1 E AC   -650 1 7 Dunham & Dunham Crotty & White

BOARD 5    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 5 1NT+1 N* H 120   8 0 Wilcox & Dawson Aldridge & Finch
4 1 1S+1 W* D   -110 2 6 Vos & Bennett Haywood & James
6 2 2NT= W* D   -120 0 8 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Coke & Parsons
8 7 2H-1 E   50   6 2 Ball & Hopkinson Kirkland & Hunter
10 9 2S-1 S* C   -100 4 4 Dunham & Dunham Crotty & White

BOARD 6    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 5 5C-5 N S   -250 4 4 Wilcox & Dawson Aldridge & Finch
4 1 4H+2 E S   -680 0 8 Vos & Bennett Haywood & James
6 2 2D+1 W C   -110 6 2 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Coke & Parsons
8 7 3NT-2 W C 200   8 0 Ball & Hopkinson Kirkland & Hunter
10 9 4H+1 E     -650 2 6 Dunham & Dunham Crotty & White

BOARD 7    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 6 3NT+2 S S 660   7 1 Vos & Bennett Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
5 2 3NT+2 S KD 660   7 1 Aldridge & Finch Coke & Parsons
7 3 3NT+1 S KD 630   2 6 Kirkland & Hunter Wilcox & Dawson
9 8 3NT+1 N C 630   2 6 Crotty & White Ball & Hopkinson
10 1 3NT+1 N KC 630   2 6 Dunham & Dunham Haywood & James

BOARD 8    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 6 1NT+1 N D 120   6 2 Vos & Bennett Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
5 2 4S-2 N AD   -100 0 8 Aldridge & Finch Coke & Parsons
7 3 4S-1 N AD   -50 3 5 Kirkland & Hunter Wilcox & Dawson
9 8 2S+1 N KD 140   8 0 Crotty & White Ball & Hopkinson
10 1 4S-1 N AD   -50 3 5 Dunham & Dunham Haywood & James

BOARD 9    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 6 2S-1 E AD 100   4 4 Vos & Bennett Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
5 2 4H= W     -620 0 8 Aldridge & Finch Coke & Parsons
7 3 2S-1 E H 100   4 4 Kirkland & Hunter Wilcox & Dawson
9 8 2S-1 E D 100   4 4 Crotty & White Ball & Hopkinson
10 1 3S-2 E AH 200   8 0 Dunham & Dunham Haywood & James

BOARD 10    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 9 3D= N S 110   3 5 Haywood & James Crotty & White
5 7 3D= N S 110   3 5 Aldridge & Finch Kirkland & Hunter
6 3 5Dx-3 S H   -800 0 8 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Wilcox & Dawson
8 4 3NT= S S 600   6 2 Ball & Hopkinson Vos & Bennett
10 2 3Dx+2 N AS 1070   8 0 Dunham & Dunham Coke & Parsons

BOARD 11    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 9 5C-2 W D 100   8 0 Haywood & James Crotty & White
5 7 3D+1 E     -130 6 2 Aldridge & Finch Kirkland & Hunter
6 3 3NT+2 E S   -460 0 8 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Wilcox & Dawson
8 4 3NT= E     -400 3 5 Ball & Hopkinson Vos & Bennett
10 2 5C= W H   -400 3 5 Dunham & Dunham Coke & Parsons

BOARD 12    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 9 3NT+1 N H 630   8 0 Haywood & James Crotty & White
5 7 2D= S   90   2 6 Aldridge & Finch Kirkland & Hunter
6 3 3S-1 S H   -100 0 8 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Wilcox & Dawson
8 4 4H= S   620   6 2 Ball & Hopkinson Vos & Bennett
10 2 2S+1 S D 140   4 4 Dunham & Dunham Coke & Parsons

BOARD 13    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 1 3Hx-3 E AC 800   8 0 Coke & Parsons Haywood & James
6 8 3D= S C 110   0 8 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Ball & Hopkinson
7 4 3H-3 E D 300   6 2 Kirkland & Hunter Vos & Bennett
9 5 4H-2 E D 200   4 4 Crotty & White Aldridge & Finch
10 3 2NT= N H 120   2 6 Dunham & Dunham Wilcox & Dawson

BOARD 14    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 1 4S= S AS 420   7 1 Coke & Parsons Haywood & James
6 8 4H-1 W S 50   2 6 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Ball & Hopkinson
7 4 4S= N H 420   7 1 Kirkland & Hunter Vos & Bennett
9 5 3D+2 S C 150   4 4 Crotty & White Aldridge & Finch
10 3 4H= W     -420 0 8 Dunham & Dunham Wilcox & Dawson

BOARD 15    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 1 3NT-2 S C   -200 0 8 Coke & Parsons Haywood & James
6 8 2D+1 N H 110   4 4 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Ball & Hopkinson
7 4 4H-1 N     -100 2 6 Kirkland & Hunter Vos & Bennett
9 5 3NT= N S 600   8 0 Crotty & White Aldridge & Finch
10 3 1NT+5 N C 240   6 2 Dunham & Dunham Wilcox & Dawson

BOARD 16    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 3H-1 E S 100   5 3 Haywood & James Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
3 2 3NT-3 E S 300   8 0 Wilcox & Dawson Coke & Parsons
7 9 3H-1 E S 100   5 3 Kirkland & Hunter Crotty & White
8 5 2H= E C   -110 2 6 Ball & Hopkinson Aldridge & Finch
10 4 2H+1 W H   -140 0 8 Dunham & Dunham Vos & Bennett

BOARD 17    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 2H= W C   -110 2 6 Haywood & James Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
3 2 4H-2 E AD 100   7 1 Wilcox & Dawson Coke & Parsons
7 9 4H-2 E AD 100   7 1 Kirkland & Hunter Crotty & White
8 5 3H-1 W H 50   4 4 Ball & Hopkinson Aldridge & Finch
10 4 3H= E AD   -140 0 8 Dunham & Dunham Vos & Bennett

BOARD 18    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 4S+1 N D 650   8 0 Haywood & James Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
3 2 4S= N H 620   6 2 Wilcox & Dawson Coke & Parsons
7 9 2S+3 N C 200   2 6 Kirkland & Hunter Crotty & White
8 5 2S+3 N AC 200   2 6 Ball & Hopkinson Aldridge & Finch
10 4 1H+4 N S 200   2 6 Dunham & Dunham Vos & Bennett

BOARD 19    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 3NT-1 W QD 100   7 1 Coke & Parsons Kirkland & Hunter
4 3 3NT= W S   -600 2 6 Vos & Bennett Wilcox & Dawson
8 1 3NT+1 E     -630 0 8 Ball & Hopkinson Haywood & James
9 6 4S-1 E AC 100   7 1 Crotty & White Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
10 5 3H= W H   -140 4 4 Dunham & Dunham Aldridge & Finch

BOARD 20    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 2S+1 E QC   -140 4 4 Coke & Parsons Kirkland & Hunter
4 3 2S+2 W D   -170 2 6 Vos & Bennett Wilcox & Dawson
8 1 4S= W JD   -620 0 8 Ball & Hopkinson Haywood & James
9 6 1NT+1 W H   -120 6 2 Crotty & White Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
10 5 2D-2 W KC 200   8 0 Dunham & Dunham Aldridge & Finch

BOARD 21    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 4S+2 E S   -480 7 1 Coke & Parsons Kirkland & Hunter
4 3 5S+1 E H   -480 7 1 Vos & Bennett Wilcox & Dawson
8 1 6S= E     -980 0 8 Ball & Hopkinson Haywood & James
9 6 3NT+3 W     -490 3 5 Crotty & White Rumbelow & Stinchcombe
10 5 3NT+3 W     -490 3 5 Dunham & Dunham Aldridge & Finch

BOARD 22    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 7 4H= S C 420   6 2 Haywood & James Kirkland & Hunter
3 8 4H= S D 420   6 2 Wilcox & Dawson Ball & Hopkinson
5 4 3H+1 S D 170   2 6 Aldridge & Finch Vos & Bennett
9 2 4H= S KC 420   6 2 Crotty & White Coke & Parsons
10 6 4H-2 S C   -100 0 8 Dunham & Dunham Rumbelow & Stinchcombe

BOARD 23    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 7 3NT-2 S S   -200 5 3 Haywood & James Kirkland & Hunter
3 8 2S= W* C   -110 8 0 Wilcox & Dawson Ball & Hopkinson
5 4 3S-4 S* H   -400 0 8 Aldridge & Finch Vos & Bennett
9 2 3D-2 S H   -200 5 3 Crotty & White Coke & Parsons
10 6 3NT-3 S S   -300 2 6 Dunham & Dunham Rumbelow & Stinchcombe

BOARD 24    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 7 3H-2 S S   -100 4 4 Haywood & James Kirkland & Hunter
3 8 4S-2 W QH 100   7 1 Wilcox & Dawson Ball & Hopkinson
5 4 3NT+2 E H   -460 0 8 Aldridge & Finch Vos & Bennett
9 2 2S+1 W QH   -140 2 6 Crotty & White Coke & Parsons
10 6 4S-2 W QH 100   7 1 Dunham & Dunham Rumbelow & Stinchcombe

BOARD 25    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 4S+1 E     -650 1 7 Haywood & James Wilcox & Dawson
2 8 6Sx-1 E KH 200   8 0 Coke & Parsons Ball & Hopkinson
4 9 4S+1 E D   -650 1 7 Vos & Bennett Crotty & White
6 5 4S= E     -620 4 4 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Aldridge & Finch
10 7 3NT-1 W D 100   6 2 Dunham & Dunham Kirkland & Hunter

BOARD 26    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 1NT+2 S   150   8 0 Haywood & James Wilcox & Dawson
2 8 1NT+1 S C 120   5 3 Coke & Parsons Ball & Hopkinson
4 9 2NT= S C 120   5 3 Vos & Bennett Crotty & White
6 5 2D-1 N     -100 0 8 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Aldridge & Finch
10 7 Pass     0   2 6 Dunham & Dunham Kirkland & Hunter
BOARD 27    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 Pass     0   2 6 Haywood & James Wilcox & Dawson
2 8 1NT= S* C 90   6 2 Coke & Parsons Ball & Hopkinson
4 9 2NT-3 W* H 150   8 0 Vos & Bennett Crotty & White
6 5 Pass     0   2 6 Rumbelow & Stinchcombe Aldridge & Finch
10 7 Pass     0   2 6 Dunham & Dunham Kirkland & Hunter
Pair 1 GEOFF HAYWOOD & DON JAMES
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 141/216 Score = 65.28% Session Rank = 2
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 110 -50 180 200 110 680 -630 50 -200 110 100 630 -800 -420 200 100
MPs 3 8 8 4 6 8 6 5 0 3 8 8 0 1 8 5
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -110 650 630 620 980 420 -200 -100 -650 150 Pass
MPs 2 8 8 8 8 6 5 4 1 8 2

Pair 2 MIKE COKE & DAVID PARSONS
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 129/216 Score = 59.72% Session Rank = 3
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 110 170 200 650 120 110 -660 100 620 -1070 400 -140 800 420 -200 -300
MPs 8 5 7 7 8 2 1 8 8 0 5 4 8 7 0 0
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -100 -620 100 -140 -480 -420 200 140 200 120 90
MPs 1 2 7 4 7 2 3 6 8 5 6

Pair 3 JOHN WILCOX & MALCOLM DAWSON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 154/216 Score = 71.30% Session Rank = 1
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -500 620 -80 -140 120 -250 -630 50 -100 800 460 100 -120 420 -240 300
MPs 0 8 4 7 8 4 6 5 4 8 8 8 6 8 2 8
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 100 620 600 170 480 420 -110 100 650 -150 Pass
MPs 7 6 6 6 1 6 8 7 7 0 6

Pair 4 BETTY VOS & MAGGIE BENNETT
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 114/216 Score = 52.78% Session Rank = 4
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -110 -170 -200 -200 -110 -680 660 120 100 -600 400 -620 -300 -420 100 140
MPs 0 3 1 4 2 0 7 6 4 2 5 2 2 1 6 8
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 140 -200 -600 -170 -480 -170 400 460 -650 120 150
MPs 8 6 2 2 7 6 8 8 1 5 8

Pair 5 FRANK ALDRIDGE & MARGARET FINCH
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 81/216 Score = 37.50% Session Rank = 9
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -110 50 -180 140 -120 250 660 -100 -620 110 -130 90 -200 -150 -600 110
MPs 5 0 0 1 0 4 7 0 0 3 6 2 4 4 0 6
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -50 -200 140 -200 490 170 -400 -460 620 100 Pass
MPs 4 6 4 0 5 2 0 0 4 8 6

Pair 6 SHEILA RUMBELOW & COLIN STINCHCOMBE
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 70/216 Score = 32.41% Session Rank = 10
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 110 -170 150 -650 -120 -110 -660 -120 -100 -800 -460 -100 110 50 110 -100
MPs 3 3 6 1 0 6 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 3
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 110 -650 -100 120 490 100 300 -100 -620 -100 Pass
MPs 6 0 1 2 5 8 6 1 4 0 2

Pair 7 JANET KIRKLAND & NORA HUNTER
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 95/216 Score = 43.98% Session Rank = 6
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -110 170 -150 140 -50 -200 630 -50 100 -110 130 -90 300 420 -100 100
MPs 5 5 2 1 2 0 2 3 4 5 2 6 6 7 2 5
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 100 200 -100 140 480 -420 200 100 -100 Pass Pass
MPs 7 2 1 4 1 2 3 4 2 6 6

Pair 8 BILL BALL & MARGERY HOPKINSON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 93/216 Score = 43.06% Session Rank = 7
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 120 -140 -200 -140 50 200 -630 -140 -100 600 -400 620 -110 -50 -110 -110
MPs 6 6 1 7 6 8 6 0 4 6 3 6 8 6 4 2
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 50 200 -630 -620 -980 -420 110 -100 -200 -120 -90
MPs 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 2

Pair 9 JAMES CROTTY & SHIRLEY WHITE
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 113/216 Score = 52.31% Session Rank = 5
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 500 -620 80 650 100 650 630 140 100 -110 -100 -630 200 150 600 -100
MPs 8 0 4 7 4 6 2 8 4 5 0 0 4 4 8 3
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -100 -200 100 -120 -490 420 -200 -140 650 -120 -150
MPs 1 6 7 6 3 6 5 2 7 3 0

Pair 10 HELEN DUNHAM & PAT DUNHAM
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 90/216 Score = 41.67% Session Rank = 8
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -120 140 200 -650 -100 -650 630 -50 200 1070 -400 140 120 -420 240 -140
MPs 2 2 7 1 4 2 2 3 8 8 3 4 2 0 6 0
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -140 200 -140 200 -490 -100 -300 100 100 Pass Pass
MPs 0 2 4 8 3 0 2 7 6 2 2