ASHBY BRIDGE CLUB              
Home

Duplicate results

8 FEBRUARY 2010

OVERALL RANKS

 

Rank

Pair

Names

Cat

Total

Max

Score

1

9

Don James & Geoff Haywood

 

153.00

216

70.83%

2

8

Bill Ball & Margery Hopkinson

 

119.00

216

55.09%

3

10

Joan Benton & Malcolm Dawson

 

118.00

216

54.63%

4

6

Betty Vos & Maggie Bennett

 

117.00

216

54.17%

5

3

Margaret Shadrack & Ann Potterton

 

110.00

216

50.93%

6

5

Claire Lewis & Shirley White

 

101.00

216

46.76%

7

4

Frank Aldridge & Margaret Finch

 

100.00

216

46.30%

8

7

Nora Hunter & Janet Kirkland

 

94.00

216

43.52%

9

2

David Parsons & Mary Danahar

 

88.00

216

40.74%

10

1

Derek Marshall & Kathleen Samuel

 

80.00

216

37.04%


BOARD 1    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 3D-2 W   100   8 0 Parsons & Danahar Aldridge & Finch
5 1 1D+1 W     -90 4 4 Lewis & White Marshall & Samuel
3 9 1NT+2 W     -150 1 7 Shadrack & Potterton James & Haywood
10 8 1H= W     -80 6 2 Benton & Dawson Ball & Hopkinson
7 6 1NT+2 W     -150 1 7 Hunter & Kirkland Vos & Bennett
BOARD 2    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 1NT-2 W   100   8 0 Parsons & Danahar Aldridge & Finch
5 1 1NT= E     -90 3 5 Lewis & White Marshall & Samuel
3 9 1NT= E     -90 3 5 Shadrack & Potterton James & Haywood
10 8 2D-1 E   50   6 2 Benton & Dawson Ball & Hopkinson
7 6 1NT+1 E     -120 0 8 Hunter & Kirkland Vos & Bennett
BOARD 3    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 3C= N   110   5 3 Parsons & Danahar Aldridge & Finch
5 1 2C+2 N   130   8 0 Lewis & White Marshall & Samuel
3 9 2C-1 N     -50 1 7 Shadrack & Potterton James & Haywood
10 8 2D-1 N     -50 1 7 Benton & Dawson Ball & Hopkinson
7 6 2C+1 N   110   5 3 Hunter & Kirkland Vos & Bennett
BOARD 4    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
8 7 3NT-1 W   100   7 1 Ball & Hopkinson Hunter & Kirkland
3 5 3H= E     -140 4 4 Shadrack & Potterton Lewis & White
6 2 5H-1 E   100   7 1 Vos & Bennett Parsons & Danahar
4 1 3H+1 E     -170 1 7 Aldridge & Finch Marshall & Samuel
10 9 3H+1 E     -170 1 7 Benton & Dawson James & Haywood
BOARD 5    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
8 7 Pass     0   5 3 Ball & Hopkinson Hunter & Kirkland
3 5 2H+3 E     -200 1 7 Shadrack & Potterton Lewis & White
6 2 2S+3 E     -200 1 7 Vos & Bennett Parsons & Danahar
4 1 Pass     0   5 3 Aldridge & Finch Marshall & Samuel
10 9 4S-3 E   150   8 0 Benton & Dawson James & Haywood
BOARD 6    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
8 7 2H+1 S   140   6 2 Ball & Hopkinson Hunter & Kirkland
3 5 2NT-1 E   100   4 4 Shadrack & Potterton Lewis & White
6 2 3D+1 E     -130 0 8 Vos & Bennett Parsons & Danahar
4 1 3NT-2 E   200   8 0 Aldridge & Finch Marshall & Samuel
10 9 3H-2 S     -100 2 6 Benton & Dawson James & Haywood
BOARD 7    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
10 1 2S+2 E     -170 4 4 Benton & Dawson Marshall & Samuel
9 8 3NT-2 E   200   8 0 James & Haywood Ball & Hopkinson
4 6 3NT+1 E     -630 2 6 Aldridge & Finch Vos & Bennett
7 3 3NT-1 E   100   6 2 Hunter & Kirkland Shadrack & Potterton
5 2 4S+1 E     -650 0 8 Lewis & White Parsons & Danahar
BOARD 8    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
10 1 1S+2 N   140   8 0 Benton & Dawson Marshall & Samuel
9 8 2H-1 N     -50 2 6 James & Haywood Ball & Hopkinson
4 6 5D-2 W   100   5 3 Aldridge & Finch Vos & Bennett
7 3 2D+1 W     -110 0 8 Hunter & Kirkland Shadrack & Potterton
5 2 1C-2 W   100   5 3 Lewis & White Parsons & Danahar
BOARD 9    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
10 1 2H+3 W     -200 6 2 Benton & Dawson Marshall & Samuel
9 8 2H+4 W     -230 4 4 James & Haywood Ball & Hopkinson
4 6 4H+2 W     -680 0 8 Aldridge & Finch Vos & Bennett
7 3 4H+1 W     -650 2 6 Hunter & Kirkland Shadrack & Potterton
5 2 5Dx-1 E   200   8 0 Lewis & White Parsons & Danahar
BOARD 10    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
6 3 1NT-2 E   200   7 1 Vos & Bennett Shadrack & Potterton
10 2 3NT-2 E   200   7 1 Benton & Dawson Parsons & Danahar
1 9 1NT= E     -90 0 8 Marshall & Samuel James & Haywood
5 7 Pass     0   2 6 Lewis & White Hunter & Kirkland
8 4 2S= S   110   4 4 Ball & Hopkinson Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 11    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
6 3 2NT= N   120   7 1 Vos & Bennett Shadrack & Potterton
10 2 1NT+1 N   120   7 1 Benton & Dawson Parsons & Danahar
1 9 2D-1 N     -50 0 8 Marshall & Samuel James & Haywood
5 7 2D= N   90   3 5 Lewis & White Hunter & Kirkland
8 4 1NT= N   90   3 5 Ball & Hopkinson Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 12    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
6 3 1NT-1 W   50   5 3 Vos & Bennett Shadrack & Potterton
10 2 1NT-1 W   50   5 3 Benton & Dawson Parsons & Danahar
1 9 1NT= W     -90 0 8 Marshall & Samuel James & Haywood
5 7 1NT-1 W   50   5 3 Lewis & White Hunter & Kirkland
8 4 1NT-1 W   50   5 3 Ball & Hopkinson Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 13    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
9 5 4S= S   620   8 0 James & Haywood Lewis & White
7 4 2H-1 N     -100 5 3 Hunter & Kirkland Aldridge & Finch
10 3 4S-1 S     -100 5 3 Benton & Dawson Shadrack & Potterton
2 1 3NT-3 S     -300 1 7 Parsons & Danahar Marshall & Samuel
6 8 3NT-3 S     -300 1 7 Vos & Bennett Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 14    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
9 5 1NT+3 S   180   7 1 James & Haywood Lewis & White
7 4 1H= S   80   2 6 Hunter & Kirkland Aldridge & Finch
10 3 1NT= N   90   4 4 Benton & Dawson Shadrack & Potterton
2 1 3H-2 S     -100 0 8 Parsons & Danahar Marshall & Samuel
6 8 1NT+3 N   180   7 1 Vos & Bennett Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 15    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
9 5 3D+1 N   130   8 0 James & Haywood Lewis & White
7 4 3D= N   110   6 2 Hunter & Kirkland Aldridge & Finch
10 3 3S-2 W   100   4 4 Benton & Dawson Shadrack & Potterton
2 1 5D-1 N     -100 1 7 Parsons & Danahar Marshall & Samuel
6 8 4D-1 N     -100 1 7 Vos & Bennett Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 16    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 2H-1 S     -50 2 6 Marshall & Samuel Vos & Bennett
8 5 2H-1 S     -50 2 6 Ball & Hopkinson Lewis & White
10 4 1NT+2 N   150   6 2 Benton & Dawson Aldridge & Finch
3 2 3C-2 E   200   8 0 Shadrack & Potterton Parsons & Danahar
7 9 1H-1 S     -50 2 6 Hunter & Kirkland James & Haywood
BOARD 17    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 2NT+1 S   150   8 0 Marshall & Samuel Vos & Bennett
8 5 1D+1 S   90   5 3 Ball & Hopkinson Lewis & White
10 4 3NT-1 S     -50 1 7 Benton & Dawson Aldridge & Finch
3 2 2NT-1 S     -50 1 7 Shadrack & Potterton Parsons & Danahar
7 9 2D= S   90   5 3 Hunter & Kirkland James & Haywood
BOARD 18    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 2S-1 N     -100 2 6 Marshall & Samuel Vos & Bennett
8 5 1NT-1 E   50   5 3 Ball & Hopkinson Lewis & White
10 4 2H= E     -110 0 8 Benton & Dawson Aldridge & Finch
3 2 3H-2 E   100   8 0 Shadrack & Potterton Parsons & Danahar
7 9 1NT-1 E   50   5 3 Hunter & Kirkland James & Haywood
BOARD 19    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 4S= N   420   7 1 Parsons & Danahar Hunter & Kirkland
9 6 4S= N   420   7 1 James & Haywood Vos & Bennett
10 5 3D= E     -110 0 8 Benton & Dawson Lewis & White
4 3 2S+1 N   140   2 6 Aldridge & Finch Shadrack & Potterton
8 1 2S+3 N   200   4 4 Ball & Hopkinson Marshall & Samuel
BOARD 20    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 4H= N   620   7 1 Parsons & Danahar Hunter & Kirkland
9 6 2C-2 E   200   4 4 James & Haywood Vos & Bennett
10 5 4H-1 N     -100 2 6 Benton & Dawson Lewis & White
4 3 3D+1 E     -130 0 8 Aldridge & Finch Shadrack & Potterton
8 1 4H= N   620   7 1 Ball & Hopkinson Marshall & Samuel
BOARD 21    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 5Sx= E     -650 0 8 Parsons & Danahar Hunter & Kirkland
9 6 4S+2 E     -480 3 5 James & Haywood Vos & Bennett
10 5 4S+2 E     -480 3 5 Benton & Dawson Lewis & White
4 3 4S+1 E     -450 6 2 Aldridge & Finch Shadrack & Potterton
8 1 4D+2 W     -170 8 0 Ball & Hopkinson Marshall & Samuel
BOARD 22    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 8 3NT+3 S   490   6 2 Shadrack & Potterton Ball & Hopkinson
1 7 3NT+2 N   460   1 7 Marshall & Samuel Hunter & Kirkland
10 6 3NT+2 S   460   1 7 Benton & Dawson Vos & Bennett
5 4 4H+2 S   480   4 4 Lewis & White Aldridge & Finch
9 2 6NT= S   990   8 0 James & Haywood Parsons & Danahar
BOARD 23    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 8 3D-1 S     -100 5 3 Shadrack & Potterton Ball & Hopkinson
1 7 3D-2 S     -200 1 7 Marshall & Samuel Hunter & Kirkland
10 6 3C-1 W   100   8 0 Benton & Dawson Vos & Bennett
5 4 3NT-2 S     -200 1 7 Lewis & White Aldridge & Finch
9 2 4H-1 N     -100 5 3 James & Haywood Parsons & Danahar
BOARD 24    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 8 2Hx+1 N   570   8 0 Shadrack & Potterton Ball & Hopkinson
1 7 2C-2 E   100   2 6 Marshall & Samuel Hunter & Kirkland
10 6 2H= S   110   4 4 Benton & Dawson Vos & Bennett
5 4 3H-1 S     -50 0 8 Lewis & White Aldridge & Finch
9 2 2NT-3 E   150   6 2 James & Haywood Parsons & Danahar
BOARD 25    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 9 2C+1 E     -110 2 6 Aldridge & Finch James & Haywood
2 8 1NT-3 N     -150 0 8 Parsons & Danahar Ball & Hopkinson
10 7 1NT-2 N     -100 4 4 Benton & Dawson Hunter & Kirkland
6 5 2NT-1 E   100   8 0 Vos & Bennett Lewis & White
1 3 Pass     0   6 2 Marshall & Samuel Shadrack & Potterton
BOARD 26    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 9 3NT= N   600   7 1 Aldridge & Finch James & Haywood
2 8 2Cx-2 E   500   4 4 Parsons & Danahar Ball & Hopkinson
10 7 3NT= S   600   7 1 Benton & Dawson Hunter & Kirkland
6 5 3NT-1 N     -100 2 6 Vos & Bennett Lewis & White
1 3 3D-2 N     -200 0 8 Marshall & Samuel Shadrack & Potterton
BOARD 27    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 9 3NT+2 W     -460 0 8 Aldridge & Finch James & Haywood
2 8 3NT+1 W     -430 3 5 Parsons & Danahar Ball & Hopkinson
10 7 3NT-2 W   100   8 0 Benton & Dawson Hunter & Kirkland
6 5 3NT+1 W     -430 3 5 Vos & Bennett Lewis & White
1 3 3NT= W     -400 6 2 Marshall & Samuel Shadrack & Potterton


Pair 1 DEREK MARSHALL & KATHLEEN SAMUEL
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 80/216 Score = 37.04% Session Rank = 10
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 90 90 -130 170 Pass -200 170 -140 200 -90 -50 -90 300 100 100 -50
MPs 4 5 0 7 3 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 7 8 7 2
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 150 -100 -200 -620 170 460 -200 100 Pass -200 -400
MPs 8 2 4 1 0 1 1 2 6 0 6

Pair 2 DAVID PARSONS & MARY DANAHAR
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 88/216 Score = 40.74% Session Rank = 9
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 100 100 110 -100 200 130 650 -100 -200 -200 -120 -50 -300 -100 -100 -200
MPs 8 8 5 1 7 8 8 3 0 1 1 3 1 0 1 0
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 50 -100 420 620 -650 -990 100 -150 -150 500 -430
MPs 7 0 7 7 0 0 3 2 0 4 3

Pair 3 MARGARET SHADRACK & ANN POTTERTON
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 110/216 Score = 50.93% Session Rank = 5
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -150 -90 -50 -140 -200 100 -100 110 650 -200 -120 -50 100 -90 -100 200
MPs 1 3 1 4 1 4 2 8 6 1 1 3 3 4 4 8
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -50 100 -140 130 450 490 -100 570 Pass 200 400
MPs 1 8 6 8 2 6 5 8 2 8 2

Pair 4 FRANK ALDRIDGE & MARGARET FINCH
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 100/216 Score = 46.30% Session Rank = 7
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -100 -100 -110 -170 Pass 200 -630 100 -680 -110 -90 -50 100 -80 -110 -150
MPs 0 0 3 1 5 8 2 5 0 4 5 3 3 6 2 2
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 50 110 140 -130 -450 -480 200 50 -110 600 -460
MPs 7 8 2 0 6 4 7 8 2 7 0

Pair 5 CLAIRE LEWIS & SHIRLEY WHITE
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 101/216 Score = 46.76% Session Rank = 6
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -90 -90 130 140 200 -100 -650 100 200 Pass 90 50 -620 -180 -130 50
MPs 4 3 8 4 7 4 0 5 8 2 3 5 0 1 0 6
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -90 -50 110 100 480 480 -200 -50 -100 100 430
MPs 3 3 8 6 5 4 1 0 0 6 5

Pair 6 BETTY VOS & MAGGIE BENNETT
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 117/216 Score = 54.17% Session Rank = 4
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 150 120 -110 100 -200 -130 630 -100 680 200 120 50 -300 180 -100 50
MPs 7 8 3 7 1 0 6 3 8 7 7 5 1 7 1 6
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -150 100 -420 -200 480 -460 -100 -110 100 -100 -430
MPs 0 6 1 4 5 7 0 4 8 2 3

Pair 7 NORA HUNTER & JANET KIRKLAND
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 94/216 Score = 43.52% Session Rank = 8
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -150 -120 110 -100 Pass -140 100 -110 -650 Pass -90 -50 -100 80 110 -50
MPs 1 0 5 1 3 2 6 0 2 6 5 3 5 2 6 2
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 90 50 -420 -620 650 -460 200 -100 100 -600 -100
MPs 5 5 1 1 8 7 7 6 4 1 0

Pair 8 BILL BALL & MARGERY HOPKINSON
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 119/216 Score = 55.09% Session Rank = 2
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 80 -50 50 100 Pass 140 -200 50 230 110 90 50 300 -180 100 -50
MPs 2 2 7 7 5 6 0 6 4 4 3 5 7 1 7 2
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 90 50 200 620 -170 -490 100 -570 150 -500 430
MPs 5 5 4 7 8 2 3 0 8 4 5

Pair 9 DON JAMES & GEOFF HAYWOOD
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 153/216 Score = 70.83% Session Rank = 1
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 150 90 50 170 -150 100 200 -50 -230 90 50 90 620 180 130 50
MPs 7 5 7 7 0 6 8 2 4 8 8 8 8 7 8 6
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -90 -50 420 200 -480 990 -100 150 110 -600 460
MPs 3 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 6 1 8

Pair 10 JOAN BENTON & MALCOLM DAWSON
Session 1 Section Sect5
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 118/216 Score = 54.63% Session Rank = 3
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -80 50 -50 -170 150 -100 -170 140 -200 200 120 50 -100 90 100 150
MPs 6 6 1 1 8 2 4 8 6 7 7 5 5 4 4 6
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -50 -110 -110 -100 -480 460 100 110 -100 600 100
MPs 1 0 0 2 3 1 8 4 4 7 8