Ashby Bridge Club Monday Duplicate 02/11/2009

---

4½ Table 27 Board Howell Movement
Director: Pat

---

OVERALL RANKS
Rank	Pair	Names	Cat	Total	Max	Score	LPs
1	3	Don James & Geoff Haywood		104.00	144	72.22%	18
2	10	Fred Wardle & David Parsons		88.00	144	61.11%	12
3	2	Pat Dunham & Joan Benton		85.00	144	59.03%	6
4	6	Sylvia Roberts & Maggie Bennett		71.00	144	49.31%
5	9	Ann Potterton & Colin Dobson		67.00	144	46.53%
6	4	James Crotty & Dean Benton		64.00	144	44.44%
7	7	Frank Aldridge & Margaret Finch		58.00	144	40.28%
8	1	Mary Danaher & John Brown		57.00	144	39.58%
9	5	Belinda Chantler & Sheila Pawson		54.00	144	37.50%

---

BOARD 1
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	4	2S-2	S			-100	2	4	Dunham & Benton	Crotty & Benton
3	9	2C-1	W		50		5	1	James & Haywood	Potterton & Dobson
5	1	3NT-1	E		50		5	1	Chantler & Pawson	Danaher & Brown
7	6	1NT+2	W			-150	0	6	Aldridge & Finch	Roberts & Bennett
BOARD 2
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	4	4C-3	N			-300	0	6	Dunham & Benton	Crotty & Benton
3	9	1Sx-3	E		500		6	0	James & Haywood	Potterton & Dobson
5	1	2D-1	N			-100	2	4	Chantler & Pawson	Danaher & Brown
7	6	2S-3	E		150		4	2	Aldridge & Finch	Roberts & Bennett
BOARD 3
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	4	2NT+2	N		180		4	2	Dunham & Benton	Crotty & Benton
3	9	3NT+1	N		430		6	0	James & Haywood	Potterton & Dobson
5	1	4H-1	N			-50	0	6	Chantler & Pawson	Danaher & Brown
7	6	2C+1	S		110		2	4	Aldridge & Finch	Roberts & Bennett
BOARD 4
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	5	2C-2	E		200		6	0	James & Haywood	Chantler & Pawson
4	1	3H=	W			-140	0	6	Crotty & Benton	Danaher & Brown
6	2	3C=	E			-110	2	4	Roberts & Bennett	Dunham & Benton
10	9	4H-1	W		100		4	2	Wardle & Parsons	Potterton & Dobson
BOARD 5
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	5	3C-2	W		100		6	0	James & Haywood	Chantler & Pawson
4	1	2H-2	S			-200	1	5	Crotty & Benton	Danaher & Brown
6	2	2H-2	S			-200	1	5	Roberts & Bennett	Dunham & Benton
10	9	3C-1	W		50		4	2	Wardle & Parsons	Potterton & Dobson
BOARD 6
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	5	3H=	S		140		6	0	James & Haywood	Chantler & Pawson
4	1	4H-3	S			-150	0	6	Crotty & Benton	Danaher & Brown
6	2	2S=	E			-110	3	3	Roberts & Bennett	Dunham & Benton
10	9	2S=	E			-110	3	3	Wardle & Parsons	Potterton & Dobson
BOARD 7
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
4	6	2S+2	E			-170	2	4	Crotty & Benton	Roberts & Bennett
5	2	3NT+1	E			-630	0	6	Chantler & Pawson	Dunham & Benton
7	3	2NT+1	E			-150	4	2	Aldridge & Finch	James & Haywood
10	1	2NT-3	E		300		6	0	Wardle & Parsons	Danaher & Brown
BOARD 8
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
4	6	6H+1	E			-1010	1	5	Crotty & Benton	Roberts & Bennett
5	2	4H+2	E			-480	4	2	Chantler & Pawson	Dunham & Benton
7	3	6H+1	E			-1010	1	5	Aldridge & Finch	James & Haywood
10	1	4H=	E			-420	6	0	Wardle & Parsons	Danaher & Brown
BOARD 9
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
4	6	1S=	S		80		2	4	Crotty & Benton	Roberts & Bennett
5	2	2S-1	S			-50	0	6	Chantler & Pawson	Dunham & Benton
7	3	1S+1	S		110		5	1	Aldridge & Finch	James & Haywood
10	1	2S=	S		110		5	1	Wardle & Parsons	Danaher & Brown
BOARD 10
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	9	2H=	N		110		4	2	Danaher & Brown	Potterton & Dobson
5	7	3H=	S		140		6	0	Chantler & Pawson	Aldridge & Finch
6	3	4Hx-1	N			-200	0	6	Roberts & Bennett	James & Haywood
10	2	3H-1	N			-100	2	4	Wardle & Parsons	Dunham & Benton
BOARD 11
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	9	6D-1	N			-50	0	6	Danaher & Brown	Potterton & Dobson
5	7	3NT+1	N		430		4	2	Chantler & Pawson	Aldridge & Finch
6	3	3NT+3	N		490		6	0	Roberts & Bennett	James & Haywood
10	2	5D+1	S		420		2	4	Wardle & Parsons	Dunham & Benton
BOARD 12
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	9	4H=	S		620		3	3	Danaher & Brown	Potterton & Dobson
5	7	4H=	S		620		3	3	Chantler & Pawson	Aldridge & Finch
6	3	4H=	S		620		3	3	Roberts & Bennett	James & Haywood
10	2	4H=	N		620		3	3	Wardle & Parsons	Dunham & Benton
BOARD 13
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	1	3H+1	E			-170	4	2	Dunham & Benton	Danaher & Brown
7	4	2C+3	W			-150	6	0	Aldridge & Finch	Crotty & Benton
9	5	3NT+2	W			-660	0	6	Potterton & Dobson	Chantler & Pawson
10	3	3NT+1	W			-630	2	4	Wardle & Parsons	James & Haywood
BOARD 14
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	1	3NT-4	W		200		6	0	Dunham & Benton	Danaher & Brown
7	4	3NT=	W			-400	0	6	Aldridge & Finch	Crotty & Benton
9	5	4H-1	W		50		2	4	Potterton & Dobson	Chantler & Pawson
10	3	3NT-2	W		100		4	2	Wardle & Parsons	James & Haywood
BOARD 15
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	1	1NT=	S		90		4	2	Dunham & Benton	Danaher & Brown
7	4	1H=	S		80		2	4	Aldridge & Finch	Crotty & Benton
9	5	3S=	N		140		6	0	Potterton & Dobson	Chantler & Pawson
10	3	2NT-2	N			-200	0	6	Wardle & Parsons	James & Haywood
BOARD 16
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	6	2S-2	S			-100	0	6	Danaher & Brown	Roberts & Bennett
3	2	2S-1	S			-50	5	1	James & Haywood	Dunham & Benton
7	9	1NT=	E			-90	2	4	Aldridge & Finch	Potterton & Dobson
10	4	1S-1	S			-50	5	1	Wardle & Parsons	Crotty & Benton
BOARD 17
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	6	1NT-2	W		100		6	0	Danaher & Brown	Roberts & Bennett
3	2	1NT=	W			-90	2	4	James & Haywood	Dunham & Benton
7	9	1NT-1	W		50		4	2	Aldridge & Finch	Potterton & Dobson
10	4	2C+1	E			-110	0	6	Wardle & Parsons	Crotty & Benton
BOARD 18
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	6	4S-3	N			-300	0	6	Danaher & Brown	Roberts & Bennett
3	2	3H=	E			-140	2	4	James & Haywood	Dunham & Benton
7	9	4H-1	W		50		4	2	Aldridge & Finch	Potterton & Dobson
10	4	3Hx-1	E		100		6	0	Wardle & Parsons	Crotty & Benton
BOARD 19
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	7	1NT+4	S		210		6	0	Dunham & Benton	Aldridge & Finch
4	3	3H-1	S			-50	0	6	Crotty & Benton	James & Haywood
9	6	2NT+2	N		180		4	2	Potterton & Dobson	Roberts & Bennett
10	5	2C-1	E		100		2	4	Wardle & Parsons	Chantler & Pawson
BOARD 20
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	7	6H-1	N			-100	0	6	Dunham & Benton	Aldridge & Finch
4	3	4H=	N		620		3	3	Crotty & Benton	James & Haywood
9	6	5H=	N		650		6	0	Potterton & Dobson	Roberts & Bennett
10	5	4H=	N		620		3	3	Wardle & Parsons	Chantler & Pawson
BOARD 21
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	7	1H+1	N		110		6	0	Dunham & Benton	Aldridge & Finch
4	3	3S-1	W		50		0	6	Crotty & Benton	James & Haywood
9	6	4S-2	W		100		3	3	Potterton & Dobson	Roberts & Bennett
10	5	4S-2	E		100		3	3	Wardle & Parsons	Chantler & Pawson
BOARD 22
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	7	1C+3	S		130		4	2	Danaher & Brown	Aldridge & Finch
5	4	2C-1	S			-50	0	6	Chantler & Pawson	Crotty & Benton
9	2	3C=	S		110		2	4	Potterton & Dobson	Dunham & Benton
10	6	2NT+1	S		150		6	0	Wardle & Parsons	Roberts & Bennett
BOARD 23
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	7	4H=	N		620		5	1	Danaher & Brown	Aldridge & Finch
5	4	4S-1	S			-100	0	6	Chantler & Pawson	Crotty & Benton
9	2	4S=	N		620		5	1	Potterton & Dobson	Dunham & Benton
10	6	2NT+3	N		210		2	4	Wardle & Parsons	Roberts & Bennett
BOARD 24
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	7	4H-2	S			-100	0	6	Danaher & Brown	Aldridge & Finch
5	4	2D=	N		90		2	4	Chantler & Pawson	Crotty & Benton
9	2	4C=	N		130		4	2	Potterton & Dobson	Dunham & Benton
10	6	4H=	S		420		6	0	Wardle & Parsons	Roberts & Bennett
BOARD 25
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	3	1NT-1	N			-50	2	4	Danaher & Brown	James & Haywood
4	9	3NT-1	E	XH	100		5	1	Crotty & Benton	Potterton & Dobson
6	5	3NT+1	E	XC		-630	0	6	Roberts & Bennett	Chantler & Pawson
10	7	2S-1	E	XC	100		5	1	Wardle & Parsons	Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 26
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	3	2D-1	N			-100	0	6	Danaher & Brown	James & Haywood
4	9	2D=	N	XH	90		2	4	Crotty & Benton	Potterton & Dobson
6	5	2H=	S	XC	110		4	2	Roberts & Bennett	Chantler & Pawson
10	7	1NTx-3	E	XS	800		6	0	Wardle & Parsons	Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 27
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
1	3	1NT-1	N			-50	0	6	Danaher & Brown	James & Haywood
4	9	2H=	N	XD	110		3	3	Crotty & Benton	Potterton & Dobson
6	5	2NT-3	W	XH	150		6	0	Roberts & Bennett	Chantler & Pawson
10	7	2H=	N	XS	110		3	3	Wardle & Parsons	Aldridge & Finch

Pair 1 MARY DANAHER & JOHN BROWN
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 57/144 Score = 39.58% Session Rank = 8
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-50	100	50	140	200	150	-300	420	-110	110	-50	620	170	-200	-90	-100
MPs	1	4	6	6	5	6	0	0	1	4	0	3	2	0	2	0
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	100	-300	--	--	--	130	620	-100	-50	-100	-50
MPs	6	0	--	--	--	4	5	0	2	0	0

---

Pair 2 PAT DUNHAM & JOAN BENTON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 85/144 Score = 59.03% Session Rank = 3
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-100	-300	180	110	200	110	630	480	50	100	-420	-620	-170	200	90	50
MPs	2	0	4	4	5	3	6	2	6	4	4	3	4	6	4	1
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	90	140	210	-100	110	-110	-620	-130	--	--	--
MPs	4	4	6	0	6	4	1	2	--	--	--

---

Pair 3 DON JAMES & GEOFF HAYWOOD
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 104/144 Score = 72.22% Session Rank = 1
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	50	500	430	200	100	140	150	1010	-110	200	-490	-620	630	-100	200	-50
MPs	5	6	6	6	6	6	2	5	1	6	0	3	4	2	6	5
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-90	-140	50	-620	-50	--	--	--	50	100	50
MPs	2	2	6	3	6	--	--	--	4	6	6

---

Pair 4 JAMES CROTTY & DEAN BENTON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 64/144 Score = 44.44% Session Rank = 6
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	100	300	-180	-140	-200	-150	-170	-1010	80	--	--	--	150	400	-80	50
MPs	4	6	2	0	1	0	2	1	2	--	--	--	0	6	4	1
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	110	-100	-50	620	50	50	100	-90	100	90	110
MPs	6	0	0	3	0	6	6	4	5	2	3

---

Pair 5 BELINDA CHANTLER & SHEILA PAWSON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 54/144 Score = 37.50% Session Rank = 9
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	50	-100	-50	-200	-100	-140	-630	-480	-50	140	430	620	660	-50	-140	--
MPs	5	2	0	0	0	0	0	4	0	6	4	3	6	4	0	--
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	--	--	-100	-620	-100	-50	-100	90	630	-110	-150
MPs	--	--	4	3	3	0	0	2	6	2	0

---

Pair 6 SYLVIA ROBERTS & MAGGIE BENNETT
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 71/144 Score = 49.31% Session Rank = 4
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	150	-150	-110	-110	-200	-110	170	1010	-80	-200	490	620	--	--	--	100
MPs	6	2	4	2	1	3	4	5	4	0	6	3	--	--	--	6
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-100	300	-180	-650	-100	-150	-210	-420	-630	110	150
MPs	0	6	2	0	3	0	4	0	0	4	6

---

Pair 7 FRANK ALDRIDGE & MARGARET FINCH
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 58/144 Score = 40.28% Session Rank = 7
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-150	150	110	--	--	--	-150	-1010	110	-140	-430	-620	-150	-400	80	-90
MPs	0	4	2	--	--	--	4	1	5	0	2	3	6	0	2	2
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	50	50	-210	100	-110	-130	-620	100	-100	-800	-110
MPs	4	4	0	6	0	2	1	6	1	0	3

---

Pair 9 ANN POTTERTON & COLIN DOBSON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 67/144 Score = 46.53% Session Rank = 5
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-50	-500	-430	-100	-50	110	--	--	--	-110	50	-620	-660	50	140	90
MPs	1	0	0	2	2	3	--	--	--	2	6	3	0	2	6	4
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-50	-50	180	650	100	110	620	130	-100	-90	-110
MPs	2	2	4	6	3	2	5	4	1	4	3

---

Pair 10 FRED WARDLE & DAVID PARSONS
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 88/144 Score = 61.11% Session Rank = 2
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	--	--	--	100	50	-110	300	-420	110	-100	420	620	-630	100	-200	-50
MPs	--	--	--	4	4	3	6	6	5	2	2	3	2	4	0	5
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-110	100	100	620	100	150	210	420	100	800	110
MPs	0	6	2	3	3	6	2	6	5	6	3

---