ASHBY BRIDGE CLUB              

DUPLICATE RESULTS
Home

Duplicate results
Monday Duplicate 22/03/2010 
5 Table 27 Board Howell Movement
Director: Pat
OVERALL RANKS
Rank Pair Names Cat Total Max Score
1 10 George Strang & Pat Dunham   142.00 216 65.74%
2= 1 Geoff Haywood & Don James   115.00 216 53.24%
2= 3 Veronica Capell & John Brown   115.00 216 53.24%
2= 8 Ann Potterton & Colin Dobson   115.00 216 53.24%
5 5 Betty Vos & Maggie Bennett   114.00 216 52.78%
6 7 Mike Coke & David Parsons   113.00 216 52.31%
7 2 Bill Ball & Margery Hopkinson   105.00 216 48.61%
8 6 Judith Smith & James Crotty   96.00 216 44.44%
9 4 Janet Kirkland & Nora Hunter   92.00 216 42.59%
10 9 Belinda Chantler & Sheila Pawson   73.00 216 33.80%
 Top = 8
BOARD 1    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 5D= W KH   -400 1 7 Ball & Hopkinson Kirkland & Hunter
3 9 2D+3 W H   -150 4 4 Capell & Brown Chantler & Pawson
5 1 3NT= W H   -400 1 7 Vos & Bennett Haywood & James
7 6 4D= W C   -130 7 1 Coke & Parsons Smith & Crotty
10 8 3D+1 W C   -130 7 1 Strang & Dunham Potterton & Dobson
BOARD 2    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 2H-3 E D 150   7 1 Ball & Hopkinson Kirkland & Hunter
3 9 3NT-3 E S 150   7 1 Capell & Brown Chantler & Pawson
5 1 3NT= E S   -400 0 8 Vos & Bennett Haywood & James
7 6 2NT-1 W S 50   3 5 Coke & Parsons Smith & Crotty
10 8 3NT-1 E S 50   3 5 Strang & Dunham Potterton & Dobson
BOARD 3    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 4 5D+1 E S   -620 0 8 Ball & Hopkinson Kirkland & Hunter
3 9 3NT= E H   -600 4 4 Capell & Brown Chantler & Pawson
5 1 3NT= E H   -600 4 4 Vos & Bennett Haywood & James
7 6 3H-3 S C   -150 8 0 Coke & Parsons Smith & Crotty
10 8 3NT= E H   -600 4 4 Strang & Dunham Potterton & Dobson
BOARD 4    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 5 5D= E C   -600 6 2 Capell & Brown Vos & Bennett
4 1 3NT= E S   -600 6 2 Kirkland & Hunter Haywood & James
6 2 3NT+2 E H   -660 1 7 Smith & Crotty Ball & Hopkinson
8 7 5D= W S   -600 6 2 Potterton & Dobson Coke & Parsons
10 9 3NT+2 E H   -660 1 7 Strang & Dunham Chantler & Pawson
BOARD 5    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 5 5C-1 S D   -100 2 6 Capell & Brown Vos & Bennett
4 1 4S-2 S     -200 0 8 Kirkland & Hunter Haywood & James
6 2 3C+2 N KH 150   4 4 Smith & Crotty Ball & Hopkinson
8 7 5C+1 N AH 620   7 1 Potterton & Dobson Coke & Parsons
10 9 5C+1 N AH 620   7 1 Strang & Dunham Chantler & Pawson
BOARD 6    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 5 2NT-2 N S   -100 5 3 Capell & Brown Vos & Bennett
4 1 2NT-3 N S   -150 0 8 Kirkland & Hunter Haywood & James
6 2 2NT-2 N S   -100 5 3 Smith & Crotty Ball & Hopkinson
8 7 2S= W AH   -110 2 6 Potterton & Dobson Coke & Parsons
10 9 4H= S AS 420   8 0 Strang & Dunham Chantler & Pawson
BOARD 7    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 6 1H+1 W S   -110 4 4 Kirkland & Hunter Smith & Crotty
5 2 1H+1 W AS   -110 4 4 Vos & Bennett Ball & Hopkinson
7 3 1H+1 W AS   -110 4 4 Coke & Parsons Capell & Brown
9 8 2S-3 S AC   -300 0 8 Chantler & Pawson Potterton & Dobson
10 1 2C= W AS   -90 8 0 Strang & Dunham Haywood & James
BOARD 8    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 6 3NT+2 E D   -460 4 4 Kirkland & Hunter Smith & Crotty
5 2 5NT= W H   -460 4 4 Vos & Bennett Ball & Hopkinson
7 3 6NT-1 E C 50   8 0 Coke & Parsons Capell & Brown
9 8 6NT= W C   -990 0 8 Chantler & Pawson Potterton & Dobson
10 1 5NT= W H   -460 4 4 Strang & Dunham Haywood & James
BOARD 9    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 6 2D+1 E S   -110 0 8 Kirkland & Hunter Smith & Crotty
5 2 1NT-1 N C   -50 4 4 Vos & Bennett Ball & Hopkinson
7 3 4S-1 N C   -50 4 4 Coke & Parsons Capell & Brown
9 8 3S-1 N S   -50 4 4 Chantler & Pawson Potterton & Dobson
10 1 3S= N AC 140   8 0 Strang & Dunham Haywood & James
BOARD 10    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 9 3NT= S C 600   6 2 Haywood & James Chantler & Pawson
5 7 3NT= S H 600   6 2 Vos & Bennett Coke & Parsons
6 3 4C-1 W AH 100   2 6 Smith & Crotty Capell & Brown
8 4 3NT-2 S C   -200 0 8 Potterton & Dobson Kirkland & Hunter
10 2 3NT= N C 600   6 2 Strang & Dunham Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 11    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 9 3NT-3 N D   -150 0 8 Haywood & James Chantler & Pawson
5 7 3D+1 E AH   -130 2 6 Vos & Bennett Coke & Parsons
6 3 3D= E H   -110 4 4 Smith & Crotty Capell & Brown
8 4 5Dx-4 W AD 800   8 0 Potterton & Dobson Kirkland & Hunter
10 2 3D-1 E C 50   6 2 Strang & Dunham Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 12    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 9 2D-1 S C   -100 2 6 Haywood & James Chantler & Pawson
5 7 2H-1 E S 50   6 2 Vos & Bennett Coke & Parsons
6 3 2H-1 E D 50   6 2 Smith & Crotty Capell & Brown
8 4 2H-1 E D 50   6 2 Potterton & Dobson Kirkland & Hunter
10 2 2H= E C   -110 0 8 Strang & Dunham Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 13    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 1 1H= N C 80   0 8 Ball & Hopkinson Haywood & James
6 8 2NTx= S S 690   8 0 Smith & Crotty Potterton & Dobson
7 4 2NT+2 S H 180   6 2 Coke & Parsons Kirkland & Hunter
9 5 2NT= N S 120   2 6 Chantler & Pawson Vos & Bennett
10 3 4D= N AC 130   4 4 Strang & Dunham Capell & Brown
BOARD 14    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 1 3NT+2 W H   -460 2 6 Ball & Hopkinson Haywood & James
6 8 5C+1 W S   -420 6 2 Smith & Crotty Potterton & Dobson
7 4 3NT+2 W H   -460 2 6 Coke & Parsons Kirkland & Hunter
9 5 3NT+2 W H   -460 2 6 Chantler & Pawson Vos & Bennett
10 3 5C= W JS   -400 8 0 Strang & Dunham Capell & Brown
BOARD 15    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 1 4S+1 S QS 650   4 4 Ball & Hopkinson Haywood & James
6 8 2S+3 S H 200   2 6 Smith & Crotty Potterton & Dobson
7 4 6S= S AD 1430   8 0 Coke & Parsons Kirkland & Hunter
9 5 4S-1 S QC   -100 0 8 Chantler & Pawson Vos & Bennett
10 3 4S+2 S H 680   6 2 Strang & Dunham Capell & Brown
BOARD 16    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 5D-2 N S   -100 2 6 Haywood & James Smith & Crotty
3 2 6Sx-2 W D 500   6 2 Capell & Brown Ball & Hopkinson
7 9 6C-2 W AD 200   4 4 Coke & Parsons Chantler & Pawson
8 5 4H+1 E D   -650 0 8 Potterton & Dobson Vos & Bennett
10 4 5Sx-3 W AD 800   8 0 Strang & Dunham Kirkland & Hunter
BOARD 17    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 3D+1 E D   -130 4 4 Haywood & James Smith & Crotty
3 2 5D= E H   -400 0 8 Capell & Brown Ball & Hopkinson
7 9 3H= S D 140   8 0 Coke & Parsons Chantler & Pawson
8 5 2D+3 E H   -150 2 6 Potterton & Dobson Vos & Bennett
10 4 5D-1 E S 50   6 2 Strang & Dunham Kirkland & Hunter
BOARD 18    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 6 2NT= W* C   -120 8 0 Haywood & James Smith & Crotty
3 2 2S+3 W D   -200 5 3 Capell & Brown Ball & Hopkinson
7 9 2NT-3 S* H   -300 2 6 Coke & Parsons Chantler & Pawson
8 5 2S+3 W C   -200 5 3 Potterton & Dobson Vos & Bennett
10 4 3NT= W* C   -400 0 8 Strang & Dunham Kirkland & Hunter
BOARD 19    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 1NT= W S   -90 1 7 Ball & Hopkinson Coke & Parsons
4 3 1NT= W S   -90 1 7 Kirkland & Hunter Capell & Brown
8 1 3S= N C 140   4 4 Potterton & Dobson Haywood & James
9 6 2H-2 W D 200   7 1 Chantler & Pawson Smith & Crotty
10 5 2D-2 E C 200   7 1 Strang & Dunham Vos & Bennett
BOARD 20    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 2NT= E S   -120 2 6 Ball & Hopkinson Coke & Parsons
4 3 3NT= E C   -600 0 8 Kirkland & Hunter Capell & Brown
8 1 3NT-1 E S 100   8 0 Potterton & Dobson Haywood & James
9 6 2D= W S   -90 6 2 Chantler & Pawson Smith & Crotty
10 5 2D+1 W C   -110 4 4 Strang & Dunham Vos & Bennett
BOARD 21    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 7 5D-1 E KS 50   6 2 Ball & Hopkinson Coke & Parsons
4 3 5D= E S   -400 1 7 Kirkland & Hunter Capell & Brown
8 1 4S-1 S     -100 4 4 Potterton & Dobson Haywood & James
9 6 5D= E AS   -400 1 7 Chantler & Pawson Smith & Crotty
10 5 4S= S S 620   8 0 Strang & Dunham Vos & Bennett
BOARD 22    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 7 4Sx-2 W QH 500   8 0 Haywood & James Coke & Parsons
3 8 4H= S D 420   4 4 Capell & Brown Potterton & Dobson
5 4 3H+1 S AS 170   0 8 Vos & Bennett Kirkland & Hunter
9 2 4H= S KD 420   4 4 Chantler & Pawson Ball & Hopkinson
10 6 4H= S C 420   4 4 Strang & Dunham Smith & Crotty
BOARD 23    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 7 2H= W AC   -110 2 6 Haywood & James Coke & Parsons
3 8 3D-1 N S   -100 4 4 Capell & Brown Potterton & Dobson
5 4 2S-1 E D 100   6 2 Vos & Bennett Kirkland & Hunter
9 2 3D-2 N KS   -200 0 8 Chantler & Pawson Ball & Hopkinson
10 6 3D= N H 110   8 0 Strang & Dunham Smith & Crotty
BOARD 24    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 7 4NTx-1 E   100   8 0 Haywood & James Coke & Parsons
3 8 2D+2 W C   -130 4 4 Capell & Brown Potterton & Dobson
5 4 3NT-1 E C 50   6 2 Vos & Bennett Kirkland & Hunter
9 2 3NT+2 E C   -460 0 8 Chantler & Pawson Ball & Hopkinson
10 6 2NT+2 E     -180 2 6 Strang & Dunham Smith & Crotty
BOARD 25    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 1NT= E     -90 2 6 Haywood & James Capell & Brown
2 8 2NT-3 W H 300   8 0 Ball & Hopkinson Potterton & Dobson
4 9 3S-1 W H 100   5 3 Kirkland & Hunter Chantler & Pawson
6 5 1NT+2 W     -150 0 8 Smith & Crotty Vos & Bennett
10 7 3S-1 W C 100   5 3 Strang & Dunham Coke & Parsons
BOARD 26    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 2H-2 N     -200 0 8 Haywood & James Capell & Brown
2 8 3C+1 E S   -130 3 5 Ball & Hopkinson Potterton & Dobson
4 9 3C= W AD   -110 7 1 Kirkland & Hunter Chantler & Pawson
6 5 2C+2 E S   -130 3 5 Smith & Crotty Vos & Bennett
10 7 3C= W AD   -110 7 1 Strang & Dunham Coke & Parsons
BOARD 27    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 3NT-2 W   100   6 2 Haywood & James Capell & Brown
2 8 2NT= E C   -120 0 8 Ball & Hopkinson Potterton & Dobson
4 9 4S-3 W D 150   8 0 Kirkland & Hunter Chantler & Pawson
6 5 4S-1 W AH 50   3 5 Smith & Crotty Vos & Bennett
10 7 2S-1 W   50   3 5 Strang & Dunham Coke & Parsons
Pair 1 GEOFF HAYWOOD & DON JAMES
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 115/216 Score = 53.24% Session Rank = 2
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 400 400 600 600 200 150 90 460 -140 600 -150 -100 -80 460 -650 -100
MPs 7 8 4 2 8 8 0 4 0 6 0 2 8 6 4 2
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -130 -120 -140 -100 100 500 -110 100 -90 -200 100
MPs 4 8 4 0 4 8 2 8 2 0 6
Pair 2 BILL BALL & MARGERY HOPKINSON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 105/216 Score = 48.61% Session Rank = 7
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -400 150 -620 660 -150 100 110 460 50 -600 -50 110 80 -460 650 -500
MPs 1 7 0 7 4 3 4 4 4 2 2 8 0 2 4 2
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 400 200 -90 -120 50 -420 200 460 300 -130 -120
MPs 8 3 1 2 6 4 8 8 8 3 0
Pair 3 VERONICA CAPELL & JOHN BROWN
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 115/216 Score = 53.24% Session Rank = 2
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -150 150 -600 -600 -100 -100 110 -50 50 -100 110 -50 -130 400 -680 500
MPs 4 7 4 6 2 5 4 0 4 6 4 2 4 0 2 6
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -400 -200 90 600 400 420 -100 -130 90 200 -100
MPs 0 5 7 8 7 4 4 4 6 8 2
Pair 4 JANET KIRKLAND & NORA HUNTER
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 92/216 Score = 42.59% Session Rank = 9
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 400 -150 620 -600 -200 -150 -110 -460 -110 200 -800 -50 -180 460 -1430 -800
MPs 7 1 8 6 0 0 4 4 0 8 0 2 2 6 0 0
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -50 400 -90 -600 -400 -170 -100 -50 100 -110 150
MPs 2 8 1 0 1 8 2 2 5 7 8
Pair 5 BETTY VOS & MAGGIE BENNETT
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 114/216 Score = 52.78% Session Rank = 5
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -400 -400 -600 600 100 100 -110 -460 -50 600 -130 50 -120 460 100 650
MPs 1 0 4 2 6 3 4 4 4 6 2 6 6 6 8 8
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 150 200 -200 110 -620 170 100 50 150 130 -50
MPs 6 3 1 4 0 0 6 6 8 5 5
Pair 6 JUDITH SMITH & JAMES CROTTY
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 96/216 Score = 44.44% Session Rank = 8
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 130 -50 150 -660 150 -100 110 460 110 100 -110 50 690 -420 200 100
MPs 1 5 0 1 4 5 4 4 8 2 4 6 8 6 2 6
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 130 120 -200 90 400 -420 -110 180 -150 -130 50
MPs 4 0 1 2 7 4 0 6 0 3 3
Pair 7 MIKE COKE & DAVID PARSONS
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 113/216 Score = 52.31% Session Rank = 6
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -130 50 -150 600 -620 110 -110 50 -50 -600 130 -50 180 -460 1430 200
MPs 7 3 8 2 1 6 4 8 4 2 6 2 6 2 8 4
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 140 -300 90 120 -50 -500 110 -100 -100 110 -50
MPs 8 2 7 6 2 0 6 0 3 1 5
Pair 8 ANN POTTERTON & COLIN DOBSON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 115/216 Score = 53.24% Session Rank = 2
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 130 -50 600 -600 620 -110 300 990 50 -200 800 50 -690 420 -200 -650
MPs 1 5 4 6 7 2 8 8 4 0 8 6 0 2 6 0
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -150 -200 140 100 -100 -420 100 130 -300 130 120
MPs 2 5 4 8 4 4 4 4 0 5 8
Pair 9 BELINDA CHANTLER & SHEILA PAWSON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 73/216 Score = 33.80% Session Rank = 10
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 150 -150 600 660 -620 -420 -300 -990 -50 -600 150 100 120 -460 -100 -200
MPs 4 1 4 7 1 0 0 0 4 2 8 6 2 2 0 4
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score -140 300 200 -90 -400 420 -200 -460 -100 110 -150
MPs 0 6 7 6 1 4 0 0 3 1 0
Pair 10 GEORGE STRANG & PAT DUNHAM
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 142/216 Score = 65.74% Session Rank = 1
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -130 50 -600 -660 620 420 -90 -460 140 600 50 -110 130 -400 680 800
MPs 7 3 4 1 7 8 8 4 8 6 6 0 4 8 6 8
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Score 50 -400 200 -110 620 420 110 -180 100 -110 50
MPs 6 0 7 4 8 4 8 2 5 7 3