Ashby Bridge Club Monday Duplicate 14/12/2009 (printed at 15/12/2009 11:13:13)

---

5½ Table 27 Board Howell Movement
Director: Pat

---

OVERALL RANKS
Rank	Pair	Names	Cat	Total	Max	Score
1	12	Pat Dunham & Joan Benton		139.00	192	72.40%
2	8	Maggie Bennett & Betty Vos		117.00	192	60.94%
3	9	Malcolm Dawson & John Wilcox		126.00	216	58.33%
4	10	Derek Marshall & David Parsons		104.00	192	54.17%
5	7	Sheila Pawson & Belinda Chantler		102.00	192	53.13%
6	5	Bill Ball & Margery Hopkinson		99.00	192	51.56%
7	6	Don James & Geoff Haywood		98.00	192	51.04%
8	3	Dean Benton & Mike Coke		89.00	192	46.35%
9	11	Janet Kirkland & Nora Hunter		71.00	192	36.98%
10	2	David Smith & Barbara Smith		77.00	216	35.65%
11	4	Margaret Finch & Frank Aldridge		58.00	192	30.21%

 Top = 8

---

BOARD 1
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	11	3S-1	E	KD	50		4	4	Benton & Coke	Kirkland & Hunter
5	2	2D=	N	AS	90		6	2	Ball & Hopkinson	Smith & Smith
6	10	2S=	E			-110	1	7	James & Haywood	Marshall & Parsons
8	4	3D=	N	H	110		8	0	Bennett & Vos	Finch & Aldridge
9	7	1S+1	E	KH		-110	1	7	Dawson & Wilcox	Pawson & Chantler
BOARD 2
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	11	3NT=	W	S		-400	4	4	Benton & Coke	Kirkland & Hunter
5	2	2C+2	E	D		-130	8	0	Ball & Hopkinson	Smith & Smith
6	10	3NT=	W	S		-400	4	4	James & Haywood	Marshall & Parsons
8	4	3NT+1	E	S		-430	0	8	Bennett & Vos	Finch & Aldridge
9	7	3NT=	E	KD		-400	4	4	Dawson & Wilcox	Pawson & Chantler
BOARD 3
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	11	1NT-2	W	H	200		8	0	Benton & Coke	Kirkland & Hunter
5	2	2H=	S	AD	110		4	4	Ball & Hopkinson	Smith & Smith
6	10	1H+1	S		110		4	4	James & Haywood	Marshall & Parsons
8	4	3S+2	E	AC		-200	0	8	Bennett & Vos	Finch & Aldridge
9	7	2H=	S	AD	110		4	4	Dawson & Wilcox	Pawson & Chantler
BOARD 4
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
6	3	2H+1	W	D		-140	0	8	James & Haywood	Benton & Coke
7	10	3C+1	W	AD		-130	2	6	Pawson & Chantler	Marshall & Parsons
9	5	5C-1	W		100		4	4	Dawson & Wilcox	Ball & Hopkinson
11	4	3D=	S	C	110		6	2	Kirkland & Hunter	Finch & Aldridge
12	2	2S+1	N	AH	140		8	0	Dunham & Benton	Smith & Smith
BOARD 5
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
6	3	2H+1	W	D		-140	3	5	James & Haywood	Benton & Coke
7	10	2H+1	W	D		-140	3	5	Pawson & Chantler	Marshall & Parsons
9	5	2S-2	S	D		-200	0	8	Dawson & Wilcox	Ball & Hopkinson
11	4	1NT-1	W	D	50		6	2	Kirkland & Hunter	Finch & Aldridge
12	2	2C=	S	AS	90		8	0	Dunham & Benton	Smith & Smith
BOARD 6
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
6	3	2NT-1	S	D		-50	3	5	James & Haywood	Benton & Coke
7	10	3NT-3	N			-150	0	8	Pawson & Chantler	Marshall & Parsons
9	5	2NT+1	S	D	150		8	0	Dawson & Wilcox	Ball & Hopkinson
11	4	2C+1	S	D	110		6	2	Kirkland & Hunter	Finch & Aldridge
12	2	2S-1	N	C		-50	3	5	Dunham & Benton	Smith & Smith
BOARD 7
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	9	5C-1	S	S		-100	1	7	Smith & Smith	Dawson & Wilcox
7	4	3NT+1	N	S	630		5	3	Pawson & Chantler	Finch & Aldridge
10	8	3NT+1	N	S	630		5	3	Marshall & Parsons	Bennett & Vos
11	5	3C-1	S	S		-100	1	7	Kirkland & Hunter	Ball & Hopkinson
12	3	3NT+2	N	H	660		8	0	Dunham & Benton	Benton & Coke
BOARD 8
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	9	2H+2	E	QC		-170	4	4	Smith & Smith	Dawson & Wilcox
7	4	2C-1	S	S		-50	8	0	Pawson & Chantler	Finch & Aldridge
10	8	3Dx=	W			-470	0	8	Marshall & Parsons	Bennett & Vos
11	5	3H+2	E	S		-200	2	6	Kirkland & Hunter	Ball & Hopkinson
12	3	4S-2	N	AD		-100	6	2	Dunham & Benton	Benton & Coke
BOARD 9
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	9	4S-1	S	C		-50	4	4	Smith & Smith	Dawson & Wilcox
7	4	4S=	S		420		8	0	Pawson & Chantler	Finch & Aldridge
10	8	6Sx-3	S	AH		-500	0	8	Marshall & Parsons	Bennett & Vos
11	5	3NT-3	S			-150	2	6	Kirkland & Hunter	Ball & Hopkinson
12	3	5C=	N	H	400		6	2	Dunham & Benton	Benton & Coke
BOARD 10
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	7	1D+1	N	H	90		4	4	Smith & Smith	Pawson & Chantler
8	5	2D+1	N	AD	110		6	2	Bennett & Vos	Ball & Hopkinson
10	9	3D-1	N	C		-100	1	7	Marshall & Parsons	Dawson & Wilcox
11	6	3D-1	N	H		-100	1	7	Kirkland & Hunter	James & Haywood
12	4	2NT+1	N	C	150		8	0	Dunham & Benton	Finch & Aldridge
BOARD 11
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	7	2S-2	N	KH		-100	0	8	Smith & Smith	Pawson & Chantler
8	5	1S+3	N	H	170		8	0	Bennett & Vos	Ball & Hopkinson
10	9	2NT=	N	C	120		4	4	Marshall & Parsons	Dawson & Wilcox
11	6	1C=	N	C	70		2	6	Kirkland & Hunter	James & Haywood
12	4	2S+1	N	D	140		6	2	Dunham & Benton	Finch & Aldridge
BOARD 12
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	7	4S+2	E	KS		-480	4	4	Smith & Smith	Pawson & Chantler
8	5	4S+2	E	H		-480	4	4	Bennett & Vos	Ball & Hopkinson
10	9	3NT+3	E	D		-490	0	8	Marshall & Parsons	Dawson & Wilcox
11	6	4S+2	E	C		-480	4	4	Kirkland & Hunter	James & Haywood
12	4	3S+1	E	D		-170	8	0	Dunham & Benton	Finch & Aldridge
BOARD 13
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	8	1NT=	W	H		-90	3	5	Benton & Coke	Bennett & Vos
4	2	1NT-1	W	D	100		7	1	Finch & Aldridge	Smith & Smith
7	11	1D+1	W	C		-90	3	5	Pawson & Chantler	Kirkland & Hunter
9	6	1NT+2	W	H		-150	0	8	Dawson & Wilcox	James & Haywood
12	5	1NT-1	W	H	100		7	1	Dunham & Benton	Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 14
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	8	4C-2	S	S		-100	4	4	Benton & Coke	Bennett & Vos
4	2	3H=	W	D		-140	2	6	Finch & Aldridge	Smith & Smith
7	11	2S-1	E	AC	50		7	1	Pawson & Chantler	Kirkland & Hunter
9	6	3D-1	W	C	50		7	1	Dawson & Wilcox	James & Haywood
12	5	4H+1	W	KC		-450	0	8	Dunham & Benton	Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 15
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	8	1NT+3	E	H		-180	0	8	Benton & Coke	Bennett & Vos
4	2	2NT-1	E		50		6	2	Finch & Aldridge	Smith & Smith
7	11	2C+1	E	AD		-110	2	6	Pawson & Chantler	Kirkland & Hunter
9	6	1NT=	E	H		-90	4	4	Dawson & Wilcox	James & Haywood
12	5	2S=	N	AH	110		8	0	Dunham & Benton	Ball & Hopkinson
BOARD 16
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	10	2H+1	E	D		-140	1	7	Smith & Smith	Marshall & Parsons
4	9	2H+1	E	D		-140	1	7	Finch & Aldridge	Dawson & Wilcox
5	3	2S+1	N	D	140		6	2	Ball & Hopkinson	Benton & Coke
8	11	3H-2	E	D	200		8	0	Bennett & Vos	Kirkland & Hunter
12	6	4S-2	N	AC		-100	4	4	Dunham & Benton	James & Haywood
BOARD 17
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	10	3NT=	W	D		-400	3	5	Smith & Smith	Marshall & Parsons
4	9	3NT+2	W	D		-460	0	8	Finch & Aldridge	Dawson & Wilcox
5	3	3NT=	W	D		-400	3	5	Ball & Hopkinson	Benton & Coke
8	11	1NT+1	E	S		-120	8	0	Bennett & Vos	Kirkland & Hunter
12	6	2Dx-2	N	AH		-300	6	2	Dunham & Benton	James & Haywood
BOARD 18
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	10	3H=	N	S	140		2	6	Smith & Smith	Marshall & Parsons
4	9	1D=	N	H	70		0	8	Finch & Aldridge	Dawson & Wilcox
5	3	1NT+2	N	C	150		4	4	Ball & Hopkinson	Benton & Coke
8	11	3NT=	N	C	600		7	1	Bennett & Vos	Kirkland & Hunter
12	6	3NT=	N	C	600		7	1	Dunham & Benton	James & Haywood
BOARD 19
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	8	3C=	N	H	110		5	3	Smith & Smith	Bennett & Vos
6	4	5C=	N	S	400		8	0	James & Haywood	Finch & Aldridge
10	3	5C-1	N	S		-50	1	7	Marshall & Parsons	Benton & Coke
11	9	3C=	N	S	110		5	3	Kirkland & Hunter	Dawson & Wilcox
12	7	5C-1	N	S		-50	1	7	Dunham & Benton	Pawson & Chantler
BOARD 20
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	8	1NTx+1	W	AS		-380	0	8	Smith & Smith	Bennett & Vos
6	4	2H+1	S	S	140		8	0	James & Haywood	Finch & Aldridge
10	3	1NT=	W			-90	4	4	Marshall & Parsons	Benton & Coke
11	9	2S-2	N	C		-200	2	6	Kirkland & Hunter	Dawson & Wilcox
12	7	2S=	N		110		6	2	Dunham & Benton	Pawson & Chantler
BOARD 21
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	8	3NT+1	N	H	630		6	2	Smith & Smith	Bennett & Vos
6	4	3NT=	N	H	600		1	7	James & Haywood	Finch & Aldridge
10	3	3NT+1	N	H	630		6	2	Marshall & Parsons	Benton & Coke
11	9	3NT=	N	H	600		1	7	Kirkland & Hunter	Dawson & Wilcox
12	7	3NT+1	N	H	630		6	2	Dunham & Benton	Pawson & Chantler
BOARD 22
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	9	2H-1	S	D		-50	3	5	Benton & Coke	Dawson & Wilcox
6	2	3H-1	S	D		-50	3	5	James & Haywood	Smith & Smith
7	5	5D-1	E	C	100		7	1	Pawson & Chantler	Ball & Hopkinson
10	4	3D-1	E	C	100		7	1	Marshall & Parsons	Finch & Aldridge
12	8	1NT+2	E			-150	0	8	Dunham & Benton	Bennett & Vos
BOARD 23
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	9	5C-2	W	AS	200		1	7	Benton & Coke	Dawson & Wilcox
6	2	4S+1	N	AH	650		7	1	James & Haywood	Smith & Smith
7	5	4S=	N	KH	620		4	4	Pawson & Chantler	Ball & Hopkinson
10	4	3S+2	N		200		1	7	Marshall & Parsons	Finch & Aldridge
12	8	4S+1	N	AH	650		7	1	Dunham & Benton	Bennett & Vos
BOARD 24
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
3	9	4S=	E	D		-420	3	5	Benton & Coke	Dawson & Wilcox
6	2	4S=	E	C		-420	3	5	James & Haywood	Smith & Smith
7	5	6S=	E	H		-980	0	8	Pawson & Chantler	Ball & Hopkinson
10	4	2S+2	E	H		-170	8	0	Marshall & Parsons	Finch & Aldridge
12	8	5Dx-2	N	C		-300	6	2	Dunham & Benton	Bennett & Vos
BOARD 25
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	11	3S+1	W	C		-170	6	2	Smith & Smith	Kirkland & Hunter
5	10	4S=	W	D		-620	3	5	Ball & Hopkinson	Marshall & Parsons
7	3	4S=	W	C		-620	3	5	Pawson & Chantler	Benton & Coke
8	6	4S+1	W	KH		-650	0	8	Bennett & Vos	James & Haywood
12	9	4S-1	W	S	100		8	0	Dunham & Benton	Dawson & Wilcox
BOARD 26
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	11	1D+4	N	S	150		2	6	Smith & Smith	Kirkland & Hunter
5	10	2NT+5	N	S	270		6	2	Ball & Hopkinson	Marshall & Parsons
7	3	2D+4	N	C	170		4	4	Pawson & Chantler	Benton & Coke
8	6	5D-1	N	H		-100	0	8	Bennett & Vos	James & Haywood
12	9	3NT+3	N	S	690		8	0	Dunham & Benton	Dawson & Wilcox
BOARD 27
NS	EW	Contract	Dec	Lead	NS+	NS-	MP	MP	NS	EW
2	11	4S+1	W	D		-450	4	4	Smith & Smith	Kirkland & Hunter
5	10	3NT+2	W	D		-460	0	8	Ball & Hopkinson	Marshall & Parsons
7	3	4H+1	W	C		-450	4	4	Pawson & Chantler	Benton & Coke
8	6	6H-1	W	AD	50		8	0	Bennett & Vos	James & Haywood
12	9	4H+1	W			-450	4	4	Dunham & Benton	Dawson & Wilcox

Pair 2 DAVID SMITH & BARBARA SMITH
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 77/216 Score = 35.65% Session Rank = 10
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-90	130	-110	-140	-90	50	-100	-170	-50	90	-100	-480	-100	140	-50	-140
MPs	2	0	4	0	0	5	1	4	4	4	0	4	1	6	2	1
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-400	140	110	-380	630	50	-650	420	-170	150	-450
MPs	3	2	5	0	6	5	1	5	6	2	4

---

Pair 3 DEAN BENTON & MIKE COKE
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 89/192 Score = 46.35% Session Rank = 8
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	50	-400	200	140	140	50	-660	100	-400	--	--	--	-90	-100	-180	-140
MPs	4	4	8	8	5	5	0	2	2	--	--	--	3	4	0	2
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	400	-150	50	90	-630	-50	200	-420	620	-170	450
MPs	5	4	7	4	2	3	1	3	5	4	4

---

Pair 4 MARGARET FINCH & FRANK ALDRIDGE
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 58/192 Score = 30.21% Session Rank = 11
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-110	430	200	-110	-50	-110	-630	50	-420	-150	-140	170	100	-140	50	-140
MPs	0	8	8	2	2	2	3	0	0	0	2	0	7	2	6	1
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-460	70	-400	-140	-600	-100	-200	170	--	--	--
MPs	0	0	0	0	7	1	7	0	--	--	--

---

Pair 5 BILL BALL & MARGERY HOPKINSON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 99/192 Score = 51.56% Session Rank = 6
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	90	-130	110	-100	200	-150	100	200	150	-110	-170	480	-100	450	-110	140
MPs	6	8	4	4	8	0	7	6	6	2	0	4	1	8	0	6
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-400	150	--	--	--	-100	-620	980	-620	270	-460
MPs	3	4	--	--	--	1	4	8	3	6	0

---

Pair 6 DON JAMES & GEOFF HAYWOOD
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 98/192 Score = 51.04% Session Rank = 7
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-110	-400	110	-140	-140	-50	--	--	--	100	-70	480	150	-50	90	100
MPs	1	4	4	0	3	3	--	--	--	7	6	4	8	1	4	4
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	300	-600	400	140	600	-50	650	-420	650	100	-50
MPs	2	1	8	8	1	3	7	3	8	8	0

---

Pair 7 SHEILA PAWSON & BELINDA CHANTLER
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 102/192 Score = 53.13% Session Rank = 5
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	110	400	-110	-130	-140	-150	630	-50	420	-90	100	480	-90	50	-110	--
MPs	7	4	4	2	3	0	5	8	8	4	8	4	3	7	2	--
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	--	--	50	-110	-630	100	620	-980	-620	170	-450
MPs	--	--	7	2	2	7	4	0	3	4	4

---

Pair 8 MAGGIE BENNETT & BETTY VOS
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 117/192 Score = 60.94% Session Rank = 2
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	110	-430	-200	--	--	--	-630	470	500	110	170	-480	90	100	180	200
MPs	8	0	0	--	--	--	3	8	8	6	8	4	5	4	8	8
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-120	600	-110	380	-630	150	-650	300	-650	-100	50
MPs	8	7	3	8	2	8	1	2	0	0	8

---

Pair 9 MALCOLM DAWSON & JOHN WILCOX
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 126/216 Score = 58.33% Session Rank = 3
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-110	-400	110	100	-200	150	100	170	50	100	-120	490	-150	50	-90	140
MPs	1	4	4	4	0	8	7	4	4	7	4	8	0	7	4	7
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	460	-70	-110	200	-600	50	-200	420	-100	-690	450
MPs	8	8	3	6	7	5	7	5	0	0	4

---

Pair 10 DEREK MARSHALL & DAVID PARSONS
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 104/192 Score = 54.17% Session Rank = 4
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	110	400	-110	130	140	150	630	-470	-500	-100	120	-490	--	--	--	140
MPs	7	4	4	6	5	8	5	0	0	1	4	0	--	--	--	7
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	400	-140	-50	-90	630	100	200	-170	620	-270	460
MPs	5	6	1	4	6	7	1	8	5	2	8

---

Pair 11 JANET KIRKLAND & NORA HUNTER
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 71/192 Score = 36.98% Session Rank = 9
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	-50	400	-200	110	50	110	-100	-200	-150	-100	70	-480	90	-50	110	-200
MPs	4	4	0	6	6	6	1	2	2	1	2	4	5	1	6	0
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	120	-600	110	-200	600	--	--	--	170	-150	450
MPs	0	1	5	2	1	--	--	--	2	6	4

---

Pair 12 PAT DUNHAM & JOAN BENTON
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 8 Matchpoints = 139/192 Score = 72.40% Session Rank = 1
Board	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Score	--	--	--	140	90	-50	660	-100	400	150	140	-170	100	-450	110	-100
MPs	--	--	--	8	8	3	8	6	6	8	6	8	7	0	8	4
Board	17	18	19	20	21	22	23	24	25	26	27
Score	-300	600	-50	110	630	-150	650	-300	100	690	-450
MPs	6	7	1	6	6	0	7	6	8	8	4

---