ASHBY BRIDGE CLUB              

DUPLICATE RESULTS
Home

Duplicate results
 Monday Duplicate 11/01/2010 
4 Table 28 Board Howell Movement
Director: Pat
OVERALL RANKS
Rank Pair Names Cat Total Max Score
1 5 Claire Lewis & Shirley White   107.00 168 63.69%
2 8 Ron Barker & Pat Dunham   104.00 168 61.90%
3 2 Mike Coke & David Parsons   91.00 168 54.17%
4 1 Don James & Geoff Haywood   89.00 168 52.98%
5 7 Malcolm Dawson & John Wilcox   80.00 168 47.62%
6= 3 Frank Aldridge & Margaret Finch   72.00 168 42.86%
6= 4 Nora Hunter & John Brown   72.00 168 42.86%
8 6 Ann Potterton & Mary Danaher   57.00 168 33.93%
 Top = 6
BOARD 1    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 5 3NT+1 E D   -430 0 6 Hunter & Brown Lewis & White
6 3 4H-1 E C 50   5 1 Potterton & Danaher Aldridge & Finch
7 2 3C+2 E S   -150 2 4 Dawson & Wilcox Coke & Parsons
8 1 3NT-1 W KD 50   5 1 Barker & Dunham James & Haywood
BOARD 2    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 5 2NT-2 S     -200 4 2 Hunter & Brown Lewis & White
6 3 2NT-3 S S   -300 1 5 Potterton & Danaher Aldridge & Finch
7 2 2C-3 S H   -300 1 5 Dawson & Wilcox Coke & Parsons
8 1 3S= W C   -140 6 0 Barker & Dunham James & Haywood
BOARD 3    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 5 3D-1 S     -50 0 6 Hunter & Brown Lewis & White
6 3 2S+1 S H 140   2 4 Potterton & Danaher Aldridge & Finch
7 2 3S+2 S JH 200   5 1 Dawson & Wilcox Coke & Parsons
8 1 3S+2 S JH 200   5 1 Barker & Dunham James & Haywood
BOARD 4    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
4 5 2H+2 S   170   0 6 Hunter & Brown Lewis & White
6 3 4H= S AC 620   4 2 Potterton & Danaher Aldridge & Finch
7 2 5Sx-1 W KH 200   2 4 Dawson & Wilcox Coke & Parsons
8 1 4H+1 S H 650   6 0 Barker & Dunham James & Haywood
BOARD 5    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 2S= N   110   6 0 James & Haywood Aldridge & Finch
5 6 5D-2 E AC 100   4 2 Lewis & White Potterton & Danaher
7 4 3D+1 E S   -130 0 6 Dawson & Wilcox Hunter & Brown
8 2 5D-1 E S 50   2 4 Barker & Dunham Coke & Parsons
BOARD 6    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 1NT+1 W*     -120 0 6 James & Haywood Aldridge & Finch
5 6 2H-1 S S   -50 2 4 Lewis & White Potterton & Danaher
7 4 1NT= N* S 90   4 2 Dawson & Wilcox Hunter & Brown
8 2 2NT-2 E* H 200   6 0 Barker & Dunham Coke & Parsons
BOARD 7    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 4S+2 S   680   6 0 James & Haywood Aldridge & Finch
5 6 2S+3 S D 200   1 5 Lewis & White Potterton & Danaher
7 4 2S+3 S D 200   1 5 Dawson & Wilcox Hunter & Brown
8 2 2S+4 S KH 230   4 2 Barker & Dunham Coke & Parsons
BOARD 8    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 3 4S-1 N     -50 0 6 James & Haywood Aldridge & Finch
5 6 4S= N C 420   4 2 Lewis & White Potterton & Danaher
7 4 2S+1 N C 140   2 4 Dawson & Wilcox Hunter & Brown
8 2 4Sx= N C 590   6 0 Barker & Dunham Coke & Parsons
BOARD 9    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 5 6D-2 N     -100 0 6 James & Haywood Lewis & White
2 4 3NT+1 S H 430   4 2 Coke & Parsons Hunter & Brown
6 7 5D= N H 400   2 4 Potterton & Danaher Dawson & Wilcox
8 3 6D= N C 920   6 0 Barker & Dunham Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 10    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 5 2S+2 E     -170 1 5 James & Haywood Lewis & White
2 4 2S+1 W D   -140 6 0 Coke & Parsons Hunter & Brown
6 7 2S+2 E D   -170 1 5 Potterton & Danaher Dawson & Wilcox
8 3 1NT+2 E H   -150 4 2 Barker & Dunham Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 11    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 5 2H+1 N* S 140   4 2 James & Haywood Lewis & White
2 4 1NT+2 S H 150   6 0 Coke & Parsons Hunter & Brown
6 7 2H= N* S 110   2 4 Potterton & Danaher Dawson & Wilcox
8 3 1H-2 W* QC 100   0 6 Barker & Dunham Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 12    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 5 1NT+1 S H 120   5 1 James & Haywood Lewis & White
2 4 2D+1 N AH 110   1 5 Coke & Parsons Hunter & Brown
6 7 2S= S H 110   1 5 Potterton & Danaher Dawson & Wilcox
8 3 1NT+1 S H 120   5 1 Barker & Dunham Aldridge & Finch
BOARD 13    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 6 3D= S S 110   6 0 Coke & Parsons Potterton & Danaher
3 5 3C= E AS   -110 4 2 Aldridge & Finch Lewis & White
7 1 2S-3 S     -300 1 5 Dawson & Wilcox James & Haywood
8 4 2NT-3 N     -300 1 5 Barker & Dunham Hunter & Brown
BOARD 14    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 6 1NT-2 W* AC 100   3 3 Coke & Parsons Potterton & Danaher
3 5 1NT= W* AH   -90 0 6 Aldridge & Finch Lewis & White
7 1 1NT-2 W* C 100   3 3 Dawson & Wilcox James & Haywood
8 4 1NT+1 N* AS 120   6 0 Barker & Dunham Hunter & Brown
BOARD 15    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 6 4Hx-3 S D   -800 0 6 Coke & Parsons Potterton & Danaher
3 5 3Dx+1 E     -570 2 4 Aldridge & Finch Lewis & White
7 1 4D-2 E   100   6 0 Dawson & Wilcox James & Haywood
8 4 2D+3 E C   -150 4 2 Barker & Dunham Hunter & Brown
BOARD 16    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 6 4H-3 E JS 300   6 0 Coke & Parsons Potterton & Danaher
3 5 4H+1 E     -650 1 5 Aldridge & Finch Lewis & White
7 1 4H+1 E     -650 1 5 Dawson & Wilcox James & Haywood
8 4 4H= W C   -620 4 2 Barker & Dunham Hunter & Brown
BOARD 17    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 2 5S= E H   -450 4 2 James & Haywood Coke & Parsons
3 7 4S+1 E H   -450 4 2 Aldridge & Finch Dawson & Wilcox
4 6 4S+1 E H   -450 4 2 Hunter & Brown Potterton & Danaher
8 5 4S+2 E S   -480 0 6 Barker & Dunham Lewis & White
BOARD 18    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 2 2NT= W* C   -120 4 2 James & Haywood Coke & Parsons
3 7 1NT+1 W* S   -120 4 2 Aldridge & Finch Dawson & Wilcox
4 6 2NT= W* S   -120 4 2 Hunter & Brown Potterton & Danaher
8 5 1NT-2 N*     -200 0 6 Barker & Dunham Lewis & White
BOARD 19    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 2 3NT+3 E S   -690 1 5 James & Haywood Coke & Parsons
3 7 3NT+2 W H   -660 4 2 Aldridge & Finch Dawson & Wilcox
4 6 2NT+3 E     -210 6 0 Hunter & Brown Potterton & Danaher
8 5 3NT+3 E S   -690 1 5 Barker & Dunham Lewis & White
BOARD 20    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
1 2 4S-1 E H 100   4 2 James & Haywood Coke & Parsons
3 7 4S-1 E C 100   4 2 Aldridge & Finch Dawson & Wilcox
4 6 4S-1 E C 100   4 2 Hunter & Brown Potterton & Danaher
8 5 5Cx-2 N AH   -500 0 6 Barker & Dunham Lewis & White
BOARD 21    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 3 4S= S C 620   6 0 Coke & Parsons Aldridge & Finch
4 1 2S+2 N D 170   3 3 Hunter & Brown James & Haywood
5 7 1NT= S D 90   0 6 Lewis & White Dawson & Wilcox
8 6 3S+1 S KD 170   3 3 Barker & Dunham Potterton & Danaher
BOARD 22    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 3 3H+1 W KC   -170 6 0 Coke & Parsons Aldridge & Finch
4 1 4H+1 E AD   -650 2 4 Hunter & Brown James & Haywood
5 7 3NT+2 E D   -660 0 6 Lewis & White Dawson & Wilcox
8 6 4H= W KC   -620 4 2 Barker & Dunham Potterton & Danaher
BOARD 23    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 3 3C+1 W AD   -130 2 4 Coke & Parsons Aldridge & Finch
4 1 5C= W AD   -600 0 6 Hunter & Brown James & Haywood
5 7 3H-2 W JD 200   4 2 Lewis & White Dawson & Wilcox
8 6 4Hx-4 W AD 1100   6 0 Barker & Dunham Potterton & Danaher
BOARD 24    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
2 3 2D+2 N S 130   6 0 Coke & Parsons Aldridge & Finch
4 1 3H= W C   -140 0 6 Hunter & Brown James & Haywood
5 7 3NT-2 W QD 100   2 4 Lewis & White Dawson & Wilcox
8 6 3D= N H 110   4 2 Barker & Dunham Potterton & Danaher
BOARD 25    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 4 2D= W     -90 4 2 Aldridge & Finch Hunter & Brown
5 2 3D-2 E AS 200   6 0 Lewis & White Coke & Parsons
6 1 2H= E S   -110 2 4 Potterton & Danaher James & Haywood
8 7 1NT+1 W C   -120 0 6 Barker & Dunham Dawson & Wilcox
BOARD 26    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 4 3C= N   110   2 4 Aldridge & Finch Hunter & Brown
5 2 3NT+1 N S 630   4 2 Lewis & White Coke & Parsons
6 1 4H-1 N D   -100 0 6 Potterton & Danaher James & Haywood
8 7 3NT+2 N H 660   6 0 Barker & Dunham Dawson & Wilcox
BOARD 27    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 4 3NT-3 E AD 150   6 0 Aldridge & Finch Hunter & Brown
5 2 2S+1 W AD   -140 2 4 Lewis & White Coke & Parsons
6 1 1NT+3 W S   -180 0 6 Potterton & Danaher James & Haywood
8 7 3C-1 W AD 50   4 2 Barker & Dunham Dawson & Wilcox
BOARD 28    
NS EW Contract Dec Lead NS+ NS- MP MP NS EW
3 4 1NT+2 W     -150 0 6 Aldridge & Finch Hunter & Brown
5 2 1NT= E D   -90 4 2 Lewis & White Coke & Parsons
6 1 2D-1 S D   -100 2 4 Potterton & Danaher James & Haywood
8 7 1NT-1 E D 50   6 0 Barker & Dunham Dawson & Wilcox
Pair 1 DON JAMES & GEOFF HAYWOOD
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 89/168 Score = 52.98% Session Rank = 4
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -50 140 -200 -650 110 -120 680 -50 -100 -170 140 120 300 -100 -100 650
MPs 1 0 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 1 4 5 5 3 0 5
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Score -450 -120 -690 100 -170 650 600 140 110 100 180 100
MPs 4 4 1 4 3 4 6 6 4 6 6 4
Pair 2 MIKE COKE & DAVID PARSONS
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 91/168 Score = 54.17% Session Rank = 3
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 150 300 -200 -200 -50 -200 -230 -590 430 -140 150 110 110 100 -800 300
MPs 4 5 1 4 4 0 2 0 4 6 6 1 6 3 0 6
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Score 450 120 690 -100 620 -170 -130 130 -200 -630 140 90
MPs 2 2 5 2 6 6 2 6 0 2 4 2
Pair 3 FRANK ALDRIDGE & MARGARET FINCH
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 72/168 Score = 42.86% Session Rank = 6
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -50 300 -140 -620 -110 120 -680 50 -920 150 -100 -120 -110 -90 -570 -650
MPs 1 5 4 2 0 6 0 6 0 2 6 1 4 0 2 1
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Score -450 -120 -660 100 -620 170 130 -130 -90 110 150 -150
MPs 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 0 4 2 6 0
Pair 4 NORA HUNTER & JOHN BROWN
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 72/168 Score = 42.86% Session Rank = 6
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -430 -200 -50 170 130 -90 -200 -140 -430 140 -150 -110 300 -120 150 620
MPs 0 4 0 0 6 2 5 4 2 0 0 5 5 0 2 2
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Score -450 -120 -210 100 170 -650 -600 -140 90 -110 -150 150
MPs 4 4 6 4 3 2 0 0 2 4 0 6
Pair 5 CLAIRE LEWIS & SHIRLEY WHITE
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 107/168 Score = 63.69% Session Rank = 1
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 430 200 50 -170 100 -50 200 420 100 170 -140 -120 110 90 570 650
MPs 6 2 6 6 4 2 1 4 6 5 2 1 2 6 4 5
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Score 480 200 690 500 90 -660 200 100 200 630 -140 -90
MPs 6 6 5 6 0 0 4 2 6 4 2 4
Pair 6 ANN POTTERTON & MARY DANAHER
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 57/168 Score = 33.93% Session Rank = 8
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 50 -300 140 620 -100 50 -200 -420 400 -170 110 110 -110 -100 800 -300
MPs 5 1 2 4 2 4 5 2 2 1 2 1 0 3 6 0
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Score 450 120 210 -100 -170 620 -1100 -110 -110 -100 -180 -100
MPs 2 2 0 2 3 2 0 2 2 0 0 2
Pair 7 MALCOLM DAWSON & JOHN WILCOX
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 80/168 Score = 47.62% Session Rank = 5
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score -150 -300 200 200 -130 90 200 140 -400 170 -110 -110 -300 100 100 -650
MPs 2 1 5 2 0 4 1 2 4 5 4 5 1 3 6 1
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Score 450 120 660 -100 -90 660 -200 -100 120 -660 -50 -50
MPs 2 2 2 2 6 6 2 4 6 0 2 0
Pair 8 RON BARKER & PAT DUNHAM
Session 1 Section 1
Top = 6 Matchpoints = 104/168 Score = 61.90% Session Rank = 2
Board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Score 50 -140 200 650 50 200 230 590 920 -150 100 120 -300 120 -150 -620
MPs 5 6 5 6 2 6 4 6 6 4 0 5 1 6 4 4
Board 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Score -480 -200 -690 -500 170 -620 1100 110 -120 660 50 50
MPs 0 0 1 0 3 4 6 4 0 6 4 6